CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon PowerShot Pro90 IS
vs Canon PowerShot S50

Archive illustration for Canon PowerShot Pro90 IS

Canon / 2001

PowerShot Pro90 IS

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Canon PowerShot S50

Canon / 2003

PowerShot S50

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
PowerShot Pro90 IS
38 mm²
PowerShot S50
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PowerShot Pro90 IS and PowerShot S50 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

PowerShot Pro90 ISMetricPowerShot S50
2.58 MPEffective pixels5 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.83 µmPixel pitch2.75 µm
14.69 µm²Pixel area7.58 µm²
6.81 MP/cm²Pixel density13.19 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
680 gWeight260 g
Compact Flash (Type I or II)StorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
Canon Lithium-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryCanon Lithium-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PowerShot Pro90 IS and PowerShot S50 have the same sensor area. The PowerShot S50 has the lighter body. The PowerShot S50 has the higher effective resolution. The PowerShot S50 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PowerShot Pro90 IS

Released in 2001, PowerShot Pro90 IS has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2.58 MP effective resolution, and a 680 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PowerShot S50

Released in 2003, PowerShot S50 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 260 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras