Reasons to choose PowerShot G16
Released in 2013, PowerShot G16 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12.1 MP effective resolution, and a 356 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon PowerShot G16
vs Canon PowerShot S200
VS
Sensor area
42 mm²
PowerShot G1642 mm²
PowerShot S200- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The PowerShot G16 and PowerShot S200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
PowerShot G16MetricPowerShot S200
12.1 MPEffective pixels10.1 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.53 × 5.64
1.87 µmPixel pitch2.05 µm
3.51 µm²Pixel area4.2 µm²
28.49 MP/cm²Pixel density23.78 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.6
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video1,280 × 720
356 gWeight181 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Lithium-Ion NB-10L rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryBattery Pack NB-6LH
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The PowerShot G16 and PowerShot S200 have the same sensor area. The PowerShot S200 has the lighter body. The PowerShot G16 has the higher effective resolution. The PowerShot S200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose PowerShot S200
Released in 2014, PowerShot S200 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 181 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.