CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon PowerShot G1
vs Canon PowerShot Pro90 IS

Archive illustration for Canon PowerShot G1

Canon / 2000

PowerShot G1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Canon PowerShot Pro90 IS

Canon / 2001

PowerShot Pro90 IS

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
PowerShot G1
38 mm²
PowerShot Pro90 IS
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PowerShot G1 and PowerShot Pro90 IS have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

PowerShot G1MetricPowerShot Pro90 IS
3.1 MPEffective pixels2.58 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.5 µmPixel pitch3.83 µm
12.22 µm²Pixel area14.69 µm²
8.18 MP/cm²Pixel density6.81 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
490 gWeight680 g
CompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, MicrodriveStorageCompact Flash (Type I or II)
Canon Lithium-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryCanon Lithium-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PowerShot G1 and PowerShot Pro90 IS have the same sensor area. The PowerShot G1 has the lighter body. The PowerShot G1 has the higher effective resolution. The PowerShot Pro90 IS is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PowerShot G1

Released in 2000, PowerShot G1 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 490 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PowerShot Pro90 IS

Released in 2001, PowerShot Pro90 IS has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2.58 MP effective resolution, and a 680 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras