Reasons to choose PowerShot A495
Released in 2010, PowerShot A495 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 135 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon PowerShot A495
vs Canon PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
PowerShot A49528 mm²
PowerShot ELPH 520 HS- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The PowerShot A495 and PowerShot ELPH 520 HS have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
PowerShot A495MetricPowerShot ELPH 520 HS
10 MPEffective pixels10.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.68 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.82 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density35.49 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
135 gWeight155 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragemicroSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
2 x AA batteries (Alkaline or NiMH)BatteryLithium-Ion NB-9L rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The PowerShot A495 and PowerShot ELPH 520 HS have the same sensor area. The PowerShot A495 has the lighter body. The PowerShot ELPH 520 HS has the higher effective resolution. The PowerShot ELPH 520 HS is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose PowerShot ELPH 520 HS
Released in 2012, PowerShot ELPH 520 HS has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 155 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.