CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon PowerShot A310
vs Praktica DC 21

Archive illustration for Canon PowerShot A310

Canon / 2004

PowerShot A310

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Praktica DC 21

Praktica / 2002

DC 21

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
PowerShot A310
21 mm²
DC 21
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PowerShot A310 and DC 21 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

PowerShot A310MetricDC 21
3.1 MPEffective pixels2.11 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.62 µmPixel pitch3.18 µm
6.88 µm²Pixel area10.1 µm²
14.54 MP/cm²Pixel density9.9 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
175 gWeight228 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PowerShot A310 and DC 21 have the same sensor area. The PowerShot A310 has the lighter body. The PowerShot A310 has the higher effective resolution. The PowerShot A310 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PowerShot A310

Released in 2004, PowerShot A310 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 175 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC 21

Released in 2002, DC 21 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 228 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras