CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon PowerShot 350
vs Nikon Coolpix 100

Archive illustration for Canon PowerShot 350

Canon / 1997

PowerShot 350

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 100

Nikon / 1997

Coolpix 100

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

17 mm²
PowerShot 350
17 mm²
Coolpix 100
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The PowerShot 350 and Coolpix 100 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

PowerShot 350MetricCoolpix 100
0.3 MPEffective pixels0.3 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor4.8 × 3.6
7.59 µmPixel pitch7.59 µm
57.6 µm²Pixel area57.6 µm²
1.74 MP/cm²Pixel density1.74 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
320 gWeight200 g
Compact FlashStorageInternal storage
Canon NiCD (optional)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The PowerShot 350 and Coolpix 100 have the same sensor area. The Coolpix 100 has the lighter body. The PowerShot 350 and Coolpix 100 have the same effective resolution. The PowerShot 350 and Coolpix 100 were both released in 1997. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose PowerShot 350

Released in 1997, PowerShot 350 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 320 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 100

Released in 1997, Coolpix 100 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras