Reasons to choose EOS Rebel SL1
Released in 2013, EOS Rebel SL1 has about 332 mm² of sensor area, 18 MP effective resolution, and a 407 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon EOS Rebel SL1
vs Sony Alpha SLT-A35
VS
Sensor area
332 mm²
EOS Rebel SL1367 mm²
Alpha SLT-A35- Area ratio
- 1.1:1
- Absolute difference
- 34 mm²
- Relative difference
- 10.3%
The Alpha SLT-A35 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EOS Rebel SL1MetricAlpha SLT-A35
18 MPEffective pixels16.2 MP
22.3 × 14.9Sensor23.5 × 15.6
4.3 µmPixel pitch4.76 µm
18.46 µm²Pixel area22.63 µm²
5.42 MP/cm²Pixel density4.42 MP/cm²
1.61Crop factor1.53
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video—
407 gWeight415 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Lithium-Ion LP-E12 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryRechargeable NP-FW50 battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Alpha SLT-A35 has the larger sensor area. The EOS Rebel SL1 has the lighter body. The EOS Rebel SL1 has the higher effective resolution. The EOS Rebel SL1 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Alpha SLT-A35
Released in 2011, Alpha SLT-A35 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 415 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.