Reasons to choose EOS R6 Mark III
Released in 2025, EOS R6 Mark III has about 858 mm² of sensor area, 32.5 MP effective resolution, and a 699 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
vs Sigma BF
VS
Sensor area
858 mm²
EOS R6 Mark III858 mm²
BF- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EOS R6 Mark III and BF have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EOS R6 Mark IIIMetricBF
32.5 MPEffective pixels24.6 MP
35.9 × 23.9Sensor35.9 × 23.9
5.14 µmPixel pitch5.91 µm
26.4 µm²Pixel area34.88 µm²
3.79 MP/cm²Pixel density2.87 MP/cm²
1Crop factor1
6,960 × 4,640 / 30pMaximum video6,016 × 3,384
699 gWeight446 g
SD UHS-II / CFexpress Type BStorageInternal storage
LP-E6P Li-ion batteryBatteryBP-81 Lithium-Ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EOS R6 Mark III and BF have the same sensor area. The BF has the lighter body. The EOS R6 Mark III has the higher effective resolution. The EOS R6 Mark III and BF were both released in 2025. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose BF
Released in 2025, BF has about 858 mm² of sensor area, 24.6 MP effective resolution, and a 446 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.