Reasons to choose EOS M6 Mark II
Released in 2019, EOS M6 Mark II has about 332 mm² of sensor area, 32.5 MP effective resolution, and a 408 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon EOS M6 Mark II
vs Fujifilm X-Pro3
VS
Sensor area
332 mm²
EOS M6 Mark II367 mm²
X-Pro3- Area ratio
- 1.1:1
- Absolute difference
- 34 mm²
- Relative difference
- 10.3%
The X-Pro3 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
EOS M6 Mark IIMetricX-Pro3
32.5 MPEffective pixels26.1 MP
22.3 × 14.9Sensor23.5 × 15.6
3.2 µmPixel pitch3.75 µm
10.22 µm²Pixel area14.05 µm²
9.78 MP/cm²Pixel density7.12 MP/cm²
1.61Crop factor1.53
3,840 × 2,160Maximum video4,096 × 2,160
408 gWeight497 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
LP-E17 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryNP-W126S lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The X-Pro3 has the larger sensor area. The EOS M6 Mark II has the lighter body. The EOS M6 Mark II has the higher effective resolution. The EOS M6 Mark II and X-Pro3 were both released in 2019. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose X-Pro3
Released in 2019, X-Pro3 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 26.1 MP effective resolution, and a 497 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.