CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon EOS M50
vs Nikon D3500

Archive illustration for Canon EOS M50

Canon / 2018

EOS M50

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon D3500

Nikon / 2018

D3500

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

332 mm²
EOS M50
367 mm²
D3500
Area ratio
1.1:1
Absolute difference
34 mm²
Relative difference
10.3%

The D3500 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

EOS M50MetricD3500
24.1 MPEffective pixels24.2 MP
22.3 × 14.9Sensor23.5 × 15.6
3.71 µmPixel pitch3.89 µm
13.79 µm²Pixel area15.15 µm²
7.25 MP/cm²Pixel density6.6 MP/cm²
1.61Crop factor1.53
3,840 × 2,160Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
387 gWeight365 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
LP-E12 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryEN-EL14a lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D3500 has the larger sensor area. The D3500 has the lighter body. The D3500 has the higher effective resolution. The EOS M50 and D3500 were both released in 2018. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EOS M50

Released in 2018, EOS M50 has about 332 mm² of sensor area, 24.1 MP effective resolution, and a 387 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D3500

Released in 2018, D3500 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.2 MP effective resolution, and a 365 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras