CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon EOS M5
vs Nikon D3400

Archive illustration for Canon EOS M5

Canon / 2016

EOS M5

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon D3400

Nikon / 2016

D3400

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

332 mm²
EOS M5
367 mm²
D3400
Area ratio
1.1:1
Absolute difference
34 mm²
Relative difference
10.3%

The D3400 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

EOS M5MetricD3400
24.2 MPEffective pixels24.2 MP
22.3 × 14.9Sensor23.5 × 15.6
3.71 µmPixel pitch3.89 µm
13.73 µm²Pixel area15.15 µm²
7.28 MP/cm²Pixel density6.6 MP/cm²
1.61Crop factor1.53
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
427 gWeight395 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
LP-E17 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryEN-EL14a lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D3400 has the larger sensor area. The D3400 has the lighter body. The EOS M5 and D3400 have the same effective resolution. The EOS M5 and D3400 were both released in 2016. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EOS M5

Released in 2016, EOS M5 has about 332 mm² of sensor area, 24.2 MP effective resolution, and a 427 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D3400

Released in 2016, D3400 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.2 MP effective resolution, and a 395 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras