CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV
vs Canon EOS 6D

Archive illustration for Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon / 2016

EOS 5D Mark IV

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Canon EOS 6D

Canon / 2012

EOS 6D

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

864 mm²
EOS 5D Mark IV
856 mm²
EOS 6D
Area ratio
1.01:1
Absolute difference
8 mm²
Relative difference
1%

The EOS 5D Mark IV has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 4 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EOS 5D Mark IVMetricEOS 6D
30.1 MPEffective pixels20.2 MP
36 × 24Sensor35.8 × 23.9
5.36 µmPixel pitch6.51 µm
28.7 µm²Pixel area42.36 µm²
3.48 MP/cm²Pixel density2.36 MP/cm²
1Crop factor1.01
4,096 × 2,160Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
890 gWeight770 g
SD/SDHC/SDXC/CompactFlashStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
LP-E6N lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion LP-E6 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EOS 5D Mark IV has the larger sensor area. The EOS 6D has the lighter body. The EOS 5D Mark IV has the higher effective resolution. The EOS 5D Mark IV is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EOS 5D Mark IV

Released in 2016, EOS 5D Mark IV has about 864 mm² of sensor area, 30.1 MP effective resolution, and a 890 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EOS 6D

Released in 2012, EOS 6D has about 856 mm² of sensor area, 20.2 MP effective resolution, and a 770 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras