CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon EOS 40D
vs Nikon D300s

Archive illustration for Canon EOS 40D

Canon / 2007

EOS 40D

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon D300s

Nikon / 2009

D300s

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

329 mm²
EOS 40D
373 mm²
D300s
Area ratio
1.13:1
Absolute difference
44 mm²
Relative difference
13.5%

The D300s has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EOS 40DMetricD300s
10.1 MPEffective pixels12.3 MP
22.2 × 14.8Sensor23.6 × 15.8
5.7 µmPixel pitch5.51 µm
32.53 µm²Pixel area30.32 µm²
3.07 MP/cm²Pixel density3.3 MP/cm²
1.62Crop factor1.52
—Maximum video—
822 gWeight938 g
Compact Flash (Type I or II)StorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive, SDHC Secure Digital
Canon Lithium-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion EN-EL3e rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D300s has the larger sensor area. The EOS 40D has the lighter body. The D300s has the higher effective resolution. The D300s is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EOS 40D

Released in 2007, EOS 40D has about 329 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 822 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D300s

Released in 2009, D300s has about 373 mm² of sensor area, 12.3 MP effective resolution, and a 938 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras