CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon EOS 250D
vs Canon EOS M200

Archive illustration for Canon EOS 250D

Canon / 2019

EOS 250D

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Canon EOS M200

Canon / 2019

EOS M200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

332 mm²
EOS 250D
332 mm²
EOS M200
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EOS 250D and EOS M200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EOS 250DMetricEOS M200
24.1 MPEffective pixels24.1 MP
22.3 × 14.9Sensor22.3 × 14.9
3.71 µmPixel pitch3.71 µm
13.79 µm²Pixel area13.79 µm²
7.25 MP/cm²Pixel density7.25 MP/cm²
1.61Crop factor1.61
3,840 × 2,160Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
449 gWeight299 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
LP-E17 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLP-E12 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EOS 250D and EOS M200 have the same sensor area. The EOS M200 has the lighter body. The EOS 250D and EOS M200 have the same effective resolution. The EOS 250D and EOS M200 were both released in 2019. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EOS 250D

Released in 2019, EOS 250D has about 332 mm² of sensor area, 24.1 MP effective resolution, and a 449 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EOS M200

Released in 2019, EOS M200 has about 332 mm² of sensor area, 24.1 MP effective resolution, and a 299 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras