CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon EOS 20D
vs Nikon D40

Archive illustration for Canon EOS 20D

Canon / 2004

EOS 20D

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon D40

Nikon / 2006

D40

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

338 mm²
EOS 20D
370 mm²
D40
Area ratio
1.1:1
Absolute difference
32 mm²
Relative difference
9.5%

The D40 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EOS 20DMetricD40
8.2 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
22.5 × 15Sensor23.7 × 15.6
6.42 µmPixel pitch7.79 µm
41.16 µm²Pixel area60.61 µm²
2.43 MP/cm²Pixel density1.65 MP/cm²
1.6Crop factor1.53
—Maximum video—
770 gWeight522 g
Compact Flash (Type I or II)StorageSecure Digital
Canon Lithium-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryNikon EN-EL9 Lithium-Ion included Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D40 has the larger sensor area. The D40 has the lighter body. The EOS 20D has the higher effective resolution. The D40 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EOS 20D

Released in 2004, EOS 20D has about 338 mm² of sensor area, 8.2 MP effective resolution, and a 770 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D40

Released in 2006, D40 has about 370 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 522 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras