CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon EOS-1D X Mark III
vs Canon EOS R6

Archive illustration for Canon EOS-1D X Mark III

Canon / 2020

EOS-1D X Mark III

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Canon EOS R6

Canon / 2020

EOS R6

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

864 mm²
EOS-1D X Mark III
858 mm²
EOS R6
Area ratio
1.01:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
0.7%

The EOS-1D X Mark III has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

EOS-1D X Mark IIIMetricEOS R6
20.1 MPEffective pixels20.1 MP
36 × 24Sensor35.9 × 23.9
6.56 µmPixel pitch6.53 µm
42.99 µm²Pixel area42.69 µm²
2.33 MP/cm²Pixel density2.34 MP/cm²
1Crop factor1
5,472 × 2,286Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
1,440 gWeight680 g
CFexpress type BStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC/UHS-II
LP-E19 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLP-E6NH lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EOS-1D X Mark III has the larger sensor area. The EOS R6 has the lighter body. The EOS-1D X Mark III and EOS R6 have the same effective resolution. The EOS-1D X Mark III and EOS R6 were both released in 2020. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EOS-1D X Mark III

Released in 2020, EOS-1D X Mark III has about 864 mm² of sensor area, 20.1 MP effective resolution, and a 1,440 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EOS R6

Released in 2020, EOS R6 has about 858 mm² of sensor area, 20.1 MP effective resolution, and a 680 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras