CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon EOS-1D X Mark II
vs Sony Alpha A99 II

Archive illustration for Canon EOS-1D X Mark II

Canon / 2016

EOS-1D X Mark II

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sony Alpha A99 II

Sony / 2016

Alpha A99 II

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

864 mm²
EOS-1D X Mark II
862 mm²
Alpha A99 II
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
2 mm²
Relative difference
0.3%

The EOS-1D X Mark II has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

EOS-1D X Mark IIMetricAlpha A99 II
20.2 MPEffective pixels42.4 MP
36 × 24Sensor35.9 × 24
6.54 µmPixel pitch4.51 µm
42.77 µm²Pixel area20.32 µm²
2.34 MP/cm²Pixel density4.92 MP/cm²
1Crop factor1
4,096 × 2,160Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
1,530 gWeight849 g
CF/CFastStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC/MS PRO Duo
LP-E19 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryNP-FM500H lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EOS-1D X Mark II has the larger sensor area. The Alpha A99 II has the lighter body. The Alpha A99 II has the higher effective resolution. The EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha A99 II were both released in 2016. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EOS-1D X Mark II

Released in 2016, EOS-1D X Mark II has about 864 mm² of sensor area, 20.2 MP effective resolution, and a 1,530 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Alpha A99 II

Released in 2016, Alpha A99 II has about 862 mm² of sensor area, 42.4 MP effective resolution, and a 849 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras