CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon EOS-1D X Mark II
vs Canon EOS 5DS

Archive illustration for Canon EOS-1D X Mark II

Canon / 2016

EOS-1D X Mark II

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Canon EOS 5DS

Canon / 2015

EOS 5DS

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

864 mm²
EOS-1D X Mark II
864 mm²
EOS 5DS
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS 5DS have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EOS-1D X Mark IIMetricEOS 5DS
20.2 MPEffective pixels50.6 MP
36 × 24Sensor36 × 24
6.54 µmPixel pitch4.13 µm
42.77 µm²Pixel area17.08 µm²
2.34 MP/cm²Pixel density5.86 MP/cm²
1Crop factor1
4,096 × 2,160Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
1,530 gWeight930 g
CF/CFastStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC, CompactFlash
LP-E19 lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryBattery Pack LP-E6

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS 5DS have the same sensor area. The EOS 5DS has the lighter body. The EOS 5DS has the higher effective resolution. The EOS-1D X Mark II is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EOS-1D X Mark II

Released in 2016, EOS-1D X Mark II has about 864 mm² of sensor area, 20.2 MP effective resolution, and a 1,530 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EOS 5DS

Released in 2015, EOS 5DS has about 864 mm² of sensor area, 50.6 MP effective resolution, and a 930 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras