CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon EOS-1D
vs Canon EOS-1Ds

Archive illustration for Canon EOS-1D

Canon / 2001

EOS-1D

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Canon EOS-1Ds

Canon / 2002

EOS-1Ds

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

548 mm²
EOS-1D
852 mm²
EOS-1Ds
Area ratio
1.55:1
Absolute difference
304 mm²
Relative difference
55.4%

The EOS-1Ds has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EOS-1DMetricEOS-1Ds
4.1 MPEffective pixels11 MP
28.7 × 19.1Sensor35.8 × 23.8
11.56 µmPixel pitch8.8 µm
133.7 µm²Pixel area77.46 µm²
0.75 MP/cm²Pixel density1.29 MP/cm²
1.26Crop factor1.01
—Maximum video—
1,585 gWeight1,585 g
Compact Flash (Type I or II)StorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
Canon Lithium-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryCanon Lithium-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EOS-1Ds has the larger sensor area. The EOS-1D and EOS-1Ds have the same body weight. The EOS-1Ds has the higher effective resolution. The EOS-1Ds is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EOS-1D

Released in 2001, EOS-1D has about 548 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 1,585 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EOS-1Ds

Released in 2002, EOS-1Ds has about 852 mm² of sensor area, 11 MP effective resolution, and a 1,585 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras