Reasons to choose EOS-1D Mark III
Released in 2007, EOS-1D Mark III has about 537 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 1,335 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon EOS-1D Mark III
vs Nikon D200
VS
Sensor area
537 mm²
EOS-1D Mark III373 mm²
D200- Area ratio
- 1.44:1
- Absolute difference
- 164 mm²
- Relative difference
- 43.9%
The EOS-1D Mark III has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EOS-1D Mark IIIMetricD200
10.1 MPEffective pixels10.2 MP
28.7 × 18.7Sensor23.6 × 15.8
7.29 µmPixel pitch6.05 µm
53.14 µm²Pixel area36.56 µm²
1.88 MP/cm²Pixel density2.74 MP/cm²
1.26Crop factor1.52
—Maximum video—
1,335 gWeight830 g
Compact Flash (Type I or II), SD/SDHC cardStorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
Lithium-Ion NB-4L battery Li-ion batteryBatteryNikon EN-EL3e Lithium-Ion battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EOS-1D Mark III has the larger sensor area. The D200 has the lighter body. The D200 has the higher effective resolution. The EOS-1D Mark III is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose D200
Released in 2005, D200 has about 373 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 830 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.