CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon EOS-1D Mark II
vs Nikon D80

Archive illustration for Canon EOS-1D Mark II

Canon / 2004

EOS-1D Mark II

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon D80

Nikon / 2006

D80

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

548 mm²
EOS-1D Mark II
373 mm²
D80
Area ratio
1.47:1
Absolute difference
175 mm²
Relative difference
47%

The EOS-1D Mark II has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EOS-1D Mark IIMetricD80
8.2 MPEffective pixels10.2 MP
28.7 × 19.1Sensor23.6 × 15.8
8.18 µmPixel pitch6.05 µm
66.85 µm²Pixel area36.56 µm²
1.5 MP/cm²Pixel density2.74 MP/cm²
1.26Crop factor1.52
—Maximum video—
1,565 gWeight668 g
Compact Flash (Type I or II), SD cardStorageSecure Digital
NP-E3 Ni-MH batteryBatteryNikon EN-EL3e Lithium-Ion battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EOS-1D Mark II has the larger sensor area. The D80 has the lighter body. The D80 has the higher effective resolution. The D80 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EOS-1D Mark II

Released in 2004, EOS-1D Mark II has about 548 mm² of sensor area, 8.2 MP effective resolution, and a 1,565 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D80

Released in 2006, D80 has about 373 mm² of sensor area, 10.2 MP effective resolution, and a 668 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras