CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon EOS-1D Mark II
vs Canon EOS D60

Archive illustration for Canon EOS-1D Mark II

Canon / 2004

EOS-1D Mark II

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Canon EOS D60

Canon / 2002

EOS D60

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

548 mm²
EOS-1D Mark II
343 mm²
EOS D60
Area ratio
1.6:1
Absolute difference
205 mm²
Relative difference
59.9%

The EOS-1D Mark II has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EOS-1D Mark IIMetricEOS D60
8.2 MPEffective pixels6.3 MP
28.7 × 19.1Sensor22.7 × 15.1
8.18 µmPixel pitch7.38 µm
66.85 µm²Pixel area54.41 µm²
1.5 MP/cm²Pixel density1.84 MP/cm²
1.26Crop factor1.59
—Maximum video—
1,565 gWeight855 g
Compact Flash (Type I or II), SD cardStorageCompact Flash (Type I or II)
NP-E3 Ni-MH batteryBatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EOS-1D Mark II has the larger sensor area. The EOS D60 has the lighter body. The EOS-1D Mark II has the higher effective resolution. The EOS-1D Mark II is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EOS-1D Mark II

Released in 2004, EOS-1D Mark II has about 548 mm² of sensor area, 8.2 MP effective resolution, and a 1,565 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EOS D60

Released in 2002, EOS D60 has about 343 mm² of sensor area, 6.3 MP effective resolution, and a 855 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras