Reasons to choose PowerShot ELPH 160
Released in 2015, PowerShot ELPH 160 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 20 MP effective resolution, and a 127 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon PowerShot ELPH 160
vs Canon PowerShot SX410 IS
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
PowerShot ELPH 16028 mm²
PowerShot SX410 IS- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The PowerShot ELPH 160 and PowerShot SX410 IS have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
PowerShot ELPH 160MetricPowerShot SX410 IS
20 MPEffective pixels20 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.19 µmPixel pitch1.19 µm
1.42 µm²Pixel area1.42 µm²
70.28 MP/cm²Pixel density70.28 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
1,280 × 720Maximum video1,280 × 720
127 gWeight325 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Li-ion Battery NB-11L/ NB-11LH Li-ion batteryBatteryBattery Pack NB-11LH
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The PowerShot ELPH 160 and PowerShot SX410 IS have the same sensor area. The PowerShot ELPH 160 has the lighter body. The PowerShot ELPH 160 and PowerShot SX410 IS have the same effective resolution. The PowerShot ELPH 160 and PowerShot SX410 IS were both released in 2015. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose PowerShot SX410 IS
Released in 2015, PowerShot SX410 IS has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 20 MP effective resolution, and a 325 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.