Reasons to choose PowerShot ELPH 135
Released in 2014, PowerShot ELPH 135 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 127 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Canon PowerShot ELPH 135
vs Canon PowerShot G16
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
PowerShot ELPH 13542 mm²
PowerShot G16- Area ratio
- 1.49:1
- Absolute difference
- 14 mm²
- Relative difference
- 49.2%
The PowerShot G16 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
PowerShot ELPH 135MetricPowerShot G16
16 MPEffective pixels12.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor7.53 × 5.64
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.87 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area3.51 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density28.49 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor4.6
1,280 × 720Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
127 gWeight356 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Battery Pack NB-11L/NB-11LHBatteryLithium-Ion NB-10L rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The PowerShot G16 has the larger sensor area. The PowerShot ELPH 135 has the lighter body. The PowerShot ELPH 135 has the higher effective resolution. The PowerShot ELPH 135 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose PowerShot G16
Released in 2013, PowerShot G16 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 12.1 MP effective resolution, and a 356 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.