CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Canon Digital IXUS 980 IS
vs Canon PowerShot A630

Archive illustration for Canon Digital IXUS 980 IS

Canon / 2008

Digital IXUS 980 IS

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Canon PowerShot A630

Canon / 2006

PowerShot A630

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
Digital IXUS 980 IS
38 mm²
PowerShot A630
Area ratio
1.12:1
Absolute difference
5 mm²
Relative difference
12.1%

The Digital IXUS 980 IS has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Digital IXUS 980 ISMetricPowerShot A630
14.7 MPEffective pixels8 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.11 × 5.33
1.7 µmPixel pitch2.18 µm
2.89 µm²Pixel area4.74 µm²
34.61 MP/cm²Pixel density21.11 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
205 gWeight327 g
SD/SDHC/MMC cardStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion NB-5L battery Li-ion batteryBatteryAA NiMH (4) batteries included

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Digital IXUS 980 IS has the larger sensor area. The Digital IXUS 980 IS has the lighter body. The Digital IXUS 980 IS has the higher effective resolution. The Digital IXUS 980 IS is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Digital IXUS 980 IS

Released in 2008, Digital IXUS 980 IS has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 14.7 MP effective resolution, and a 205 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose PowerShot A630

Released in 2006, PowerShot A630 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 327 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras