CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ G1
vs BenQ GH200

VS
Archive illustration for BenQ GH200

BenQ / 2012

GH200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
G1
28 mm²
GH200
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The G1 and GH200 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

G1MetricGH200
14 MPEffective pixels14.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.42 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.02 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density49.54 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
195 gWeight—
Internal storageStorage—
Lithium-ion rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBattery—

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The G1 and GH200 have the same sensor area. The GH200 has the lighter body. The GH200 has the higher effective resolution. The G1 and GH200 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose G1

Released in 2012, G1 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 195 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose GH200

Released in 2012, GH200 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras