CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC T800
vs BenQ DC X725

Archive illustration for BenQ DC T800

BenQ / 2007

DC T800

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC X725

BenQ / 2007

DC X725

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

27 mm²
DC T800
25 mm²
DC X725
Area ratio
1.1:1
Absolute difference
2 mm²
Relative difference
9.7%

The DC T800 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC T800MetricDC X725
8 MPEffective pixels7.2 MP
6.03 × 4.52Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.85 µmPixel pitch1.86 µm
3.41 µm²Pixel area3.45 µm²
29.35 MP/cm²Pixel density28.99 MP/cm²
5.74Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery—

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC T800 has the larger sensor area. The DC X725 has the lighter body. The DC T800 has the higher effective resolution. The DC T800 and DC X725 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC T800

Released in 2007, DC T800 has about 27 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC X725

Released in 2007, DC X725 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras