CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC E41
vs BenQ DC S30

Archive illustration for BenQ DC E41

BenQ / 2004

DC E41

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC S30

BenQ / 2004

DC S30

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC E41
21 mm²
DC S30
Area ratio
1.17:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
16.5%

The DC E41 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC E41MetricDC S30
4.23 MPEffective pixels3.34 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.33 × 4
2.42 µmPixel pitch2.53 µm
5.87 µm²Pixel area6.38 µm²
17.03 MP/cm²Pixel density15.67 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
127 gWeight180 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC E41 has the larger sensor area. The DC E41 has the lighter body. The DC E41 has the higher effective resolution. The DC E41 and DC S30 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC E41

Released in 2004, DC E41 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.23 MP effective resolution, and a 127 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC S30

Released in 2004, DC S30 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras