Reasons to choose DC E310
Released in 2006, DC E310 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 82 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
BenQ DC E310
vs BenQ DC E600
VS
Sensor area
31 mm²
DC E31025 mm²
DC E600- Area ratio
- 1.24:1
- Absolute difference
- 6 mm²
- Relative difference
- 23.7%
The DC E310 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
DC E310MetricDC E600
3.2 MPEffective pixels6 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor5.75 × 4.32
3.1 µmPixel pitch2.03 µm
9.6 µm²Pixel area4.14 µm²
10.42 MP/cm²Pixel density24.15 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
82 gWeight135 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AAABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC E310 has the larger sensor area. The DC E310 has the lighter body. The DC E600 has the higher effective resolution. The DC E310 and DC E600 were both released in 2006. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC E600
Released in 2006, DC E600 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 135 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.