CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC E300
vs BenQ DC E63 Plus

Archive illustration for BenQ DC E300

BenQ / 2005

DC E300

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC E63 Plus

BenQ / 2005

DC E63 Plus

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
DC E300
25 mm²
DC E63 Plus
Area ratio
1.24:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
23.7%

The DC E300 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC E300MetricDC E63 Plus
3.14 MPEffective pixels6 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor5.75 × 4.32
3.13 µmPixel pitch2.03 µm
9.78 µm²Pixel area4.14 µm²
10.22 MP/cm²Pixel density24.15 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
82 gWeight—
—StorageSecure Digital
—BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC E300 has the larger sensor area. The DC E63 Plus has the lighter body. The DC E63 Plus has the higher effective resolution. The DC E300 and DC E63 Plus were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC E300

Released in 2005, DC E300 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.14 MP effective resolution, and a 82 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC E63 Plus

Released in 2005, DC E63 Plus has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras