CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC E30
vs BenQ DC S40

Archive illustration for BenQ DC E30

BenQ / 2004

DC E30

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC S40

BenQ / 2004

DC S40

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
DC E30
25 mm²
DC S40
Area ratio
1.24:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
23.7%

The DC E30 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC E30MetricDC S40
3.14 MPEffective pixels4.24 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor5.75 × 4.32
3.13 µmPixel pitch2.42 µm
9.78 µm²Pixel area5.86 µm²
10.22 MP/cm²Pixel density17.07 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
82 gWeight180 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AAABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC E30 has the larger sensor area. The DC E30 has the lighter body. The DC S40 has the higher effective resolution. The DC E30 and DC S40 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC E30

Released in 2004, DC E30 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.14 MP effective resolution, and a 82 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC S40

Released in 2004, DC S40 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.24 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras