CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC E1420
vs BenQ DC S1420

Archive illustration for BenQ DC E1420

BenQ / 2011

DC E1420

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC S1420

BenQ / 2011

DC S1420

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DC E1420
28 mm²
DC S1420
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC E1420 and DC S1420 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC E1420MetricDC S1420
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC E1420 and DC S1420 have the same sensor area. The DC S1420 has the lighter body. The DC E1420 and DC S1420 have the same effective resolution. The DC E1420 and DC S1420 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC E1420

Released in 2011, DC E1420 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC S1420

Released in 2011, DC S1420 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras