CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC E1240
vs BenQ DC L1020

Archive illustration for BenQ DC E1240

BenQ / 2010

DC E1240

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC L1020

BenQ / 2010

DC L1020

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DC E1240
28 mm²
DC L1020
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC E1240 and DC L1020 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC E1240MetricDC L1020
12 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
110 gWeight120 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC E1240 and DC L1020 have the same sensor area. The DC E1240 has the lighter body. The DC E1240 has the higher effective resolution. The DC E1240 and DC L1020 were both released in 2010. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC E1240

Released in 2010, DC E1240 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC L1020

Released in 2010, DC L1020 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras