CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC E1050t
vs BenQ DC T850

Archive illustration for BenQ DC E1050t

BenQ / 2008

DC E1050t

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC T850

BenQ / 2008

DC T850

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DC E1050t
25 mm²
DC T850
Area ratio
1.15:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
14.6%

The DC E1050t has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC E1050tMetricDC T850
10 MPEffective pixels8 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight120 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC E1050t has the larger sensor area. The DC T850 has the lighter body. The DC E1050t has the higher effective resolution. The DC E1050t and DC T850 were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC E1050t

Released in 2008, DC E1050t has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC T850

Released in 2008, DC T850 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras