Reasons to choose DC E1050
Released in 2008, DC E1050 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
BenQ DC E1050
vs BenQ DC E1050t
VS
Sensor area
42 mm²
DC E105028 mm²
DC E1050t- Area ratio
- 1.49:1
- Absolute difference
- 14 mm²
- Relative difference
- 49.2%
The DC E1050 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
DC E1050MetricDC E1050t
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor6.16 × 4.62
2.06 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
4.25 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
23.55 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight140 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC E1050 has the larger sensor area. The DC E1050 has the lighter body. The DC E1050 and DC E1050t have the same effective resolution. The DC E1050 and DC E1050t were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC E1050t
Released in 2008, DC E1050t has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.