Reasons to choose DC E1020
Released in 2009, DC E1020 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
BenQ DC E1020
vs BenQ DC E1030
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
DC E102028 mm²
DC E1030- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DC E1020 and DC E1030 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
DC E1020MetricDC E1030
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight110 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC E1020 and DC E1030 have the same sensor area. The DC E1030 has the lighter body. The DC E1020 and DC E1030 have the same effective resolution. The DC E1020 and DC E1030 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC E1030
Released in 2009, DC E1030 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.