CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C840
vs BenQ DC E820

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C840

BenQ / 2007

DC C840

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC E820

BenQ / 2007

DC E820

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC C840
25 mm²
DC E820
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C840 and DC E820 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC C840MetricDC E820
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight130 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C840 and DC E820 have the same sensor area. The DC E820 has the lighter body. The DC C840 and DC E820 have the same effective resolution. The DC C840 and DC E820 were both released in 2007. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C840

Released in 2007, DC C840 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC E820

Released in 2007, DC E820 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras