CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C750
vs BenQ DC E610

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C750

BenQ / 2008

DC C750

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC E610

BenQ / 2007

DC E610

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC C750
25 mm²
DC E610
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C750 and DC E610 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC C750MetricDC E610
7 MPEffective pixels6.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.88 µmPixel pitch2.02 µm
3.55 µm²Pixel area4.07 µm²
28.18 MP/cm²Pixel density24.56 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight135 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C750 and DC E610 have the same sensor area. The DC E610 has the lighter body. The DC C750 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C750 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C750

Released in 2008, DC C750 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC E610

Released in 2007, DC E610 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 135 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras