CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C640
vs BenQ DC P860

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C640

BenQ / 2008

DC C640

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC P860

BenQ / 2007

DC P860

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
DC C640
38 mm²
DC P860
Area ratio
1.12:1
Absolute difference
5 mm²
Relative difference
12.1%

The DC C640 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC C640MetricDC P860
6 MPEffective pixels8 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.66 µmPixel pitch2.18 µm
7.08 µm²Pixel area4.74 µm²
14.13 MP/cm²Pixel density21.11 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight182 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C640 has the larger sensor area. The DC C640 has the lighter body. The DC P860 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C640 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C640

Released in 2008, DC C640 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC P860

Released in 2007, DC P860 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 182 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras