CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C640
vs BenQ DC E1050

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C640

BenQ / 2008

DC C640

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC E1050

BenQ / 2008

DC E1050

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
DC C640
42 mm²
DC E1050
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C640 and DC E1050 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC C640MetricDC E1050
6 MPEffective pixels10 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.53 × 5.64
2.66 µmPixel pitch2.06 µm
7.08 µm²Pixel area4.25 µm²
14.13 MP/cm²Pixel density23.55 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.6
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight120 g
Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C640 and DC E1050 have the same sensor area. The DC E1050 has the lighter body. The DC E1050 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C640 and DC E1050 were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C640

Released in 2008, DC C640 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC E1050

Released in 2008, DC E1050 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras