CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C640
vs BenQ DC C750

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C640

BenQ / 2008

DC C640

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC C750

BenQ / 2008

DC C750

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
DC C640
25 mm²
DC C750
Area ratio
1.71:1
Absolute difference
18 mm²
Relative difference
71%

The DC C640 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC C640MetricDC C750
6 MPEffective pixels7 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.66 µmPixel pitch1.88 µm
7.08 µm²Pixel area3.55 µm²
14.13 MP/cm²Pixel density28.18 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight140 g
Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C640 has the larger sensor area. The DC C640 and DC C750 have the same body weight. The DC C750 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C640 and DC C750 were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C640

Released in 2008, DC C640 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC C750

Released in 2008, DC C750 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras