CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C630
vs BenQ DC X710

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C630

BenQ / 2006

DC C630

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC X710

BenQ / 2006

DC X710

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC C630
25 mm²
DC X710
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C630 and DC X710 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC C630MetricDC X710
6 MPEffective pixels7 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.03 µmPixel pitch1.88 µm
4.14 µm²Pixel area3.55 µm²
24.15 MP/cm²Pixel density28.18 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight130 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C630 and DC X710 have the same sensor area. The DC C630 and DC X710 have the same body weight. The DC X710 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C630 and DC X710 were both released in 2006. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C630

Released in 2006, DC C630 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC X710

Released in 2006, DC X710 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras