CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C610
vs BenQ DC C750

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C610

BenQ / 2007

DC C610

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC C750

BenQ / 2008

DC C750

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC C610
25 mm²
DC C750
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C610 and DC C750 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC C610MetricDC C750
6 MPEffective pixels7 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.03 µmPixel pitch1.88 µm
4.14 µm²Pixel area3.55 µm²
24.15 MP/cm²Pixel density28.18 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
85 gWeight140 g
Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C610 and DC C750 have the same sensor area. The DC C610 has the lighter body. The DC C750 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C750 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C610

Released in 2007, DC C610 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 85 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC C750

Released in 2008, DC C750 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras