CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C60
vs BenQ DC S40

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C60

BenQ / 2004

DC C60

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC S40

BenQ / 2004

DC S40

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
DC C60
25 mm²
DC S40
Area ratio
1.53:1
Absolute difference
13 mm²
Relative difference
52.6%

The DC C60 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC C60MetricDC S40
6.36 MPEffective pixels4.24 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.44 µmPixel pitch2.42 µm
5.96 µm²Pixel area5.86 µm²
16.78 MP/cm²Pixel density17.07 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
180 gWeight180 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C60 has the larger sensor area. The DC C60 and DC S40 have the same body weight. The DC C60 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C60 and DC S40 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C60

Released in 2004, DC C60 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.36 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC S40

Released in 2004, DC S40 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.24 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras