CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C60
vs BenQ DC C62

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C60

BenQ / 2004

DC C60

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC C62

BenQ / 2004

DC C62

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
DC C60
38 mm²
DC C62
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C60 and DC C62 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC C60MetricDC C62
6.36 MPEffective pixels6.37 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.44 µmPixel pitch2.44 µm
5.96 µm²Pixel area5.95 µm²
16.78 MP/cm²Pixel density16.81 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
180 gWeight168 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C60 and DC C62 have the same sensor area. The DC C62 has the lighter body. The DC C62 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C60 and DC C62 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C60

Released in 2004, DC C60 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.36 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC C62

Released in 2004, DC C62 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.37 MP effective resolution, and a 168 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras