CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C520
vs BenQ DC X600

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C520

BenQ / 2005

DC C520

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC X600

BenQ / 2005

DC X600

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC C520
25 mm²
DC X600
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C520 and DC X600 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC C520MetricDC X600
5 MPEffective pixels6.36 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.23 µmPixel pitch1.98 µm
4.97 µm²Pixel area3.91 µm²
20.13 MP/cm²Pixel density25.6 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight130 g
—StorageSecure Digital
—BatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C520 and DC X600 have the same sensor area. The DC C520 and DC X600 have the same body weight. The DC X600 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C520 and DC X600 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C520

Released in 2005, DC C520 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC X600

Released in 2005, DC X600 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6.36 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras