CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C520
vs BenQ DC E520

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C520

BenQ / 2005

DC C520

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC E520

BenQ / 2005

DC E520

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC C520
25 mm²
DC E520
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C520 and DC E520 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC C520MetricDC E520
5 MPEffective pixels5 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.23 µmPixel pitch2.23 µm
4.97 µm²Pixel area4.97 µm²
20.13 MP/cm²Pixel density20.13 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight130 g
—Storage—
—Battery—

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C520 and DC E520 have the same sensor area. The DC C520 and DC E520 have the same body weight. The DC C520 and DC E520 have the same effective resolution. The DC C520 and DC E520 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C520

Released in 2005, DC C520 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC E520

Released in 2005, DC E520 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras