CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C520
vs BenQ DC E510

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C520

BenQ / 2005

DC C520

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC E510

BenQ / 2005

DC E510

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC C520
25 mm²
DC E510
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C520 and DC E510 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC C520MetricDC E510
5 MPEffective pixels5 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.23 µmPixel pitch2.23 µm
4.97 µm²Pixel area4.97 µm²
20.13 MP/cm²Pixel density20.13 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight150 g
—Storage—
—Battery—

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C520 and DC E510 have the same sensor area. The DC C520 has the lighter body. The DC C520 and DC E510 have the same effective resolution. The DC C520 and DC E510 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C520

Released in 2005, DC C520 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC E510

Released in 2005, DC E510 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras