CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C35
vs BenQ DC E41

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C35

BenQ / 2004

DC C35

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC E41

BenQ / 2004

DC E41

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC C35
25 mm²
DC E41
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C35 and DC E41 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC C35MetricDC E41
3.21 MPEffective pixels4.23 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.78 µmPixel pitch2.42 µm
7.74 µm²Pixel area5.87 µm²
12.92 MP/cm²Pixel density17.03 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
144 gWeight127 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C35 and DC E41 have the same sensor area. The DC E41 has the lighter body. The DC E41 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C35 and DC E41 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C35

Released in 2004, DC C35 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.21 MP effective resolution, and a 144 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC E41

Released in 2004, DC E41 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.23 MP effective resolution, and a 127 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras