CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C1060
vs BenQ DC E1050t

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C1060

BenQ / 2008

DC C1060

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC E1050t

BenQ / 2008

DC E1050t

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DC C1060
28 mm²
DC E1050t
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C1060 and DC E1050t have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC C1060MetricDC E1050t
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight140 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C1060 and DC E1050t have the same sensor area. The DC C1060 and DC E1050t have the same body weight. The DC C1060 and DC E1050t have the same effective resolution. The DC C1060 and DC E1050t were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C1060

Released in 2008, DC C1060 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC E1050t

Released in 2008, DC E1050t has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras